Hi,

Essentially top of the Devices/Gateway list which in turn alters the position 
in the sipxbridge.xml file etc.

Cheers
Grant

________________________________________
From: Melcon Moraes [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, 2 April 2009 9:23 a.m.
To: Grant Lang
Cc: Damian Krzeminski; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SipXecs 3.11.12 Gateway vs Dialing Rulles Error/Bug

When you say "gateway is at the top of", are you refering to the
Gateways list at Devices/Gateways or the list inside your Local
Diaplan rule at System/Dialplan ?

-MM

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Grant Lang
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes you are correct Local Auckland has an area code of 9 and Tauranga has an 
> area code of 7.
>
> My ITSP allows you to have local numbers in each area and separate 
> registrations for them, so you can register the Tauranga number as a gateway 
> and the Auckland one as a separate gateway, although both registrations go to 
> the same ITSP.
>
> What happens when I dial using that configuration though is the call gets 
> routed out the gateway at the top of the list, so when I dial a Tauranga 
> number (07) if the Auckland gateway is at the top of the bridge then the call 
> goes through the ITSP as an Auckland number and doesnt take advantage of 
> least cost routing, i.e. coming out on the Tauranga PSTN.
>
> Does that make sense and did it help?
>
> Cheers
> Grant
>
> ________________________________________
> From: [email protected] 
> [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Damian Krzeminski 
> [[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, 2 April 2009 8:44 a.m.
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SipXecs 3.11.12 Gateway vs Dialing Rulles Error/Bug
>
> Scott Lawrence wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 07:58 +1300, Grant Lang wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Thanks for the reply.
>>> I have a suggestion, what if I added entries into the host file and created 
>>> separate entries for the ITSP but pointed to the same ITSP?
>>> For example
>>> 202.67.162.1    a.itsp.com
>>> 202.67.162.1    b.itsp.com
>>>
>>> And then in each Gateway pointed the gateway to that host?
>>>
>>> I am not sure that would work because the fallbackrules.xml resolves the 
>>> itsp domain name and puts an IP Address into the fallbackrules.xml file?
>>>
>>> Is there a possibility in either case that I could use an external rules 
>>> file and if so how would I configure that?
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help.
>>> Grant
>>>
>>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>>> <mappings xmlns="http://www.sipfoundry.org/sipX/schema/xml/fallback-00-00";>
>>>   <hostMatch>
>>>     <hostPattern>FQDN</hostPattern>
>>>     <hostPattern>FQHN</hostPattern>
>>>     <hostPattern>HostName</hostPattern>
>>>     <hostPattern>10.1.2.11</hostPattern>
>>>     <userMatch>
>>>       <!--Local Auckland-->
>>>       <description>Local Auckland dialing</description>
>>>       <userPattern>909.</userPattern>
>>>       <userPattern>99.</userPattern>
>>>       <transform>
>>>         <user>09{vdigits}</user>
>>>         <host>202.180.76.166</host>
>>>         <headerparams>route=10.1.2.11:5090</headerparams>
>>>         <headerparams>expires=60</headerparams>
>>>         <fieldparams>q=0.9</fieldparams>
>>>       </transform>
>>>     </userMatch>
>>>     <userMatch>
>>>       <!--Local Tauranga-->
>>>       <description>Local Tauranga Dialing</description>
>>>       <userPattern>907.</userPattern>
>>>       <transform>
>>>         <user>07{vdigits}</user>
>>>         <host>202.180.76.166</host>
>>>         <headerparams>route=10.1.2.11:5090</headerparams>
>>>         <headerparams>expires=60</headerparams>
>>>         <fieldparams>q=0.9</fieldparams>
>>>       </transform>
>>>     </userMatch>
>>>   </hostMatch>
>>> </mappings>
>>
>> That looks correct.
>>
>> I think you should get call traces of calls that work and calls that
>> don't and take a snapshot.
>>
>> Don't jump to conclusions about what's happening
>>
>
> I does look OK: but I am not sure if I understand your setup.
> Looks like you have 2 rules "Local Auckland" and "Local Tauranga".
> They both send calls to the same physical gateway (202.180.76.166) through
> the same SBC (10.1.2.11:5090). The only difference between the 2 gateways
> are inserted prefixes.
>
> How is it different form what you expected?
> D.
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
>
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users

Reply via email to