On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Grant Lang <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Essentially top of the Devices/Gateway list which in turn alters the position > in the sipxbridge.xml file etc. > > Cheers > Grant
Could I request you to post the contents of etc/sipxpbx/sipxbridge.xml after removing passwords. Thanks > > ________________________________________ > From: Melcon Moraes [[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, 2 April 2009 9:23 a.m. > To: Grant Lang > Cc: Damian Krzeminski; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SipXecs 3.11.12 Gateway vs Dialing Rulles Error/Bug > > When you say "gateway is at the top of", are you refering to the > Gateways list at Devices/Gateways or the list inside your Local > Diaplan rule at System/Dialplan ? > > -MM > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Grant Lang > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Yes you are correct Local Auckland has an area code of 9 and Tauranga has an >> area code of 7. >> >> My ITSP allows you to have local numbers in each area and separate >> registrations for them, so you can register the Tauranga number as a gateway >> and the Auckland one as a separate gateway, although both registrations go >> to the same ITSP. >> >> What happens when I dial using that configuration though is the call gets >> routed out the gateway at the top of the list, so when I dial a Tauranga >> number (07) if the Auckland gateway is at the top of the bridge then the >> call goes through the ITSP as an Auckland number and doesnt take advantage >> of least cost routing, i.e. coming out on the Tauranga PSTN. >> >> Does that make sense and did it help? >> >> Cheers >> Grant >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: [email protected] >> [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Damian Krzeminski >> [[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, 2 April 2009 8:44 a.m. >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SipXecs 3.11.12 Gateway vs Dialing Rulles Error/Bug >> >> Scott Lawrence wrote: >>> On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 07:58 +1300, Grant Lang wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> Thanks for the reply. >>>> I have a suggestion, what if I added entries into the host file and >>>> created separate entries for the ITSP but pointed to the same ITSP? >>>> For example >>>> 202.67.162.1 a.itsp.com >>>> 202.67.162.1 b.itsp.com >>>> >>>> And then in each Gateway pointed the gateway to that host? >>>> >>>> I am not sure that would work because the fallbackrules.xml resolves the >>>> itsp domain name and puts an IP Address into the fallbackrules.xml file? >>>> >>>> Is there a possibility in either case that I could use an external rules >>>> file and if so how would I configure that? >>>> >>>> Thanks for your help. >>>> Grant >>>> >>>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> >>>> <mappings xmlns="http://www.sipfoundry.org/sipX/schema/xml/fallback-00-00";> >>>> <hostMatch> >>>> <hostPattern>FQDN</hostPattern> >>>> <hostPattern>FQHN</hostPattern> >>>> <hostPattern>HostName</hostPattern> >>>> <hostPattern>10.1.2.11</hostPattern> >>>> <userMatch> >>>> <!--Local Auckland--> >>>> <description>Local Auckland dialing</description> >>>> <userPattern>909.</userPattern> >>>> <userPattern>99.</userPattern> >>>> <transform> >>>> <user>09{vdigits}</user> >>>> <host>202.180.76.166</host> >>>> <headerparams>route=10.1.2.11:5090</headerparams> >>>> <headerparams>expires=60</headerparams> >>>> <fieldparams>q=0.9</fieldparams> >>>> </transform> >>>> </userMatch> >>>> <userMatch> >>>> <!--Local Tauranga--> >>>> <description>Local Tauranga Dialing</description> >>>> <userPattern>907.</userPattern> >>>> <transform> >>>> <user>07{vdigits}</user> >>>> <host>202.180.76.166</host> >>>> <headerparams>route=10.1.2.11:5090</headerparams> >>>> <headerparams>expires=60</headerparams> >>>> <fieldparams>q=0.9</fieldparams> >>>> </transform> >>>> </userMatch> >>>> </hostMatch> >>>> </mappings> >>> >>> That looks correct. >>> >>> I think you should get call traces of calls that work and calls that >>> don't and take a snapshot. >>> >>> Don't jump to conclusions about what's happening >>> >> >> I does look OK: but I am not sure if I understand your setup. >> Looks like you have 2 rules "Local Auckland" and "Local Tauranga". >> They both send calls to the same physical gateway (202.180.76.166) through >> the same SBC (10.1.2.11:5090). The only difference between the 2 gateways >> are inserted prefixes. >> >> How is it different form what you expected? >> D. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users >> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users >> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users >> > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
