Still, you have no real "survivability" from the phones. You should ask your "boss" to consider the health and human safety factor in this type of decision. You could use a local gateway and program the phones to use it to dial "911". You could place a sipx system, even what Matt is suggesting, at each branch that would be "hands off". In every option it means "something" else at the branch.
Not everything should be centralized. Aggregated, yes, centralized (IMO) no. There are a lot of efficiencies you gain with de-centralization, as you are discovering now. On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 5:03 PM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Thank you. So, it this completely a function of the SBC? If I used an SBC > that supported this feature, should it work from a Sipx point of view then? > I'm not saying I would go this route, but I just want to see what my > options are. If I'm going to consider putting a device at each facility, > then I would have to also consider switching to a different SBC. Obviously, > that would have been poor planning on my part. I was given a short time line > to get this done at my corporate office because of an unplanned relocation. > Oh well :) > > > On 2/1/2010 3:41 PM, Scott Lawrence wrote: > >> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 16:09 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: >> >> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Scott Lawrence >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 14:25 -0600, [email protected] >>> wrote: >>> > Does anyone know if this is even a common feature among SIP >>> servers? >>> > Verizon is indicating they have never worked with a client >>> setup that >>> > didn't support this. Maybe something is getting lost in >>> translation >>> > here. >>> >>> >>> I'm not clear on what you're going to have in the branch. >>> What is the >>> complete sequence of devices and network segments between the >>> phone in a >>> branch and your central sipXecs, and where are the connections >>> to >>> Verizon? >>> >>> >>> >>> He wants sipx in the HQ with the remote branch phones registering to >>> it, using sipXbridge as the gateway for the trunks, but with the media >>> anchored at the handsets in the branches to the Verizon Gateway (not >>> to sipXbridge). >>> >>> >> Right... the feature you're looking for is: >> >> http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-5034 >> >> it's not expressed the same way, but that's what you would need. If >> implemented, it would allow sipXbridge to get out of the media path. >> >> That issue is not yet scheduled for any specific release. >> >> >> >> >> > > -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas? Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
