There are fax machines that are on POTS lines and a metered line that
can also be used with a traditional handset on it (that would also work
in a power failure).
I do understand what you are saying. Somethings are not my decision though.
On 2/1/2010 4:16 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
Still, you have no real "survivability" from the phones. You should
ask your "boss" to consider the health and human safety factor in this
type of decision. You could use a local gateway and program the phones
to use it to dial "911". You could place a sipx system, even what Matt
is suggesting, at each branch that would be "hands off". In every
option it means "something" else at the branch.
Not everything should be centralized. Aggregated, yes, centralized
(IMO) no. There are a lot of efficiencies you gain with
de-centralization, as you are discovering now.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 5:03 PM, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Thank you. So, it this completely a function of the SBC? If I used
an SBC that supported this feature, should it work from a Sipx
point of view then?
I'm not saying I would go this route, but I just want to see what
my options are. If I'm going to consider putting a device at each
facility, then I would have to also consider switching to a
different SBC. Obviously, that would have been poor planning on my
part. I was given a short time line to get this done at my
corporate office because of an unplanned relocation. Oh well :)
On 2/1/2010 3:41 PM, Scott Lawrence wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 16:09 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Scott Lawrence
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 14:25 -0600,
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:
> Does anyone know if this is even a common feature among SIP
servers?
> Verizon is indicating they have never worked with a client
setup that
> didn't support this. Maybe something is getting lost in
translation
> here.
I'm not clear on what you're going to have in the
branch.
What is the
complete sequence of devices and network segments
between the
phone in a
branch and your central sipXecs, and where are the
connections
to
Verizon?
He wants sipx in the HQ with the remote branch phones
registering to
it, using sipXbridge as the gateway for the trunks, but
with the media
anchored at the handsets in the branches to the Verizon
Gateway (not
to sipXbridge).
Right... the feature you're looking for is:
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-5034
it's not expressed the same way, but that's what you would
need. If
implemented, it would allow sipXbridge to get out of the media
path.
That issue is not yet scheduled for any specific release.
--
======================
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
Fax: 434.984.8427
Helpdesk Contract Customers:
http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas?
Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
