On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 17:53 +0400, Nikolay Kondratyev wrote: > Scott, > > Thank you very much for the detailed clarification. > Sipx in my case uses it's own dns, which is private (not available from > internet). > But my test phone is "remote worker" behind remote nat. > And remote in this case also means distant :) - about 5500 km between me and > sipx. > And there is no split dns (at least yet)... > > So I configured 217.106.156.51 (externally visible nated sipx address) as > domain alias. > > At the moment I can not ask to call from internal phone (which uses sipx as > dns server), time gap is too big... > On Monday I'll verify if it'll work as expected. > > And a question: may be it's worth thinking about extending "domain alias" > feature to my case?
You'll find that there are a number of cases that "domain alias" does not cover... this is at present one of them. Feel free to file an improvement issue for that, but I wouldn't hold my breath... The big problem with domain aliases is that they rapidly expand the number of checks that have to be done on every message - take every decision that's got anything to do with the domain part and multiply the number by the number of aliases. One of the higher priority items for the next release is to provide a much better set of tools for management of DNS, and part of that should be support for split DNS configuration... we'll see. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
