Yes.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Patten [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 9:57 AM > To: Picher, Michael > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Use one IP address for multiple gateways in > sipX? > > And this works for location (branch) based call routing? > > Josh Patten > Assistant Network Administrator > Brazos County IT Dept. > (979) 361-4676 > > > On 6/22/2010 5:12 AM, Picher, Michael wrote: > > Josh, > > > > I think when I do it I just create a new gateway and use the ip but > give > > it a different gateway name in sipX. > > > > I'm pretty sure that works fine. > > > > Mike > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh > Patten > > Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 4:09 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Use one IP address for multiple gateways in > > sipX? > > > > Yes I did: Two different A records (not CNAMEs). I set a different > > branch for each gateway and made sure the "shared" checkbox was not > > checked. The way my system is currently set up is I have one main > > "shared" Audiocodes mediant 1000 with a PRI connection to the outside > > world. In the dial plan I put all the non-shared gateways that sipX > > should try before the main shared gateway (for location based > dialing) > > in the dial plan order and then add the non-shared "emergency dial" > > gateways (in the event the main gateway is down) after the shared > > gateway in the dial plan order. > > > > In the case of the gateway that required two hostnames, I have a need > > for two extensions (6177 and 6536) to use that gateway "before" the > > shared gateway and another group of extensions to use it "after" the > > shared gateway so in the event the audiocodes gateway is unavailable > the > > > > local gateway can be used. What actually happened when I set it up > that > > way was that all of the extensions that pointed to the two different > > hostnames would stop at the first gateway (I am assuming because the > IP > > matched even though I was using A records) that was supposed to be > used > > by the two extensions 6177 and 6536. > > > > Did any of that make sense? What kind of logs should I gather? > > > > Josh Patten > > Assistant Network Administrator > > Brazos County IT Dept. > > (979) 361-4676 > > > > > > On 6/21/2010 2:30 PM, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) wrote: > > > >> ________________________________________ > >> From: [email protected] > >> > > [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh Patten > > [[email protected]] > > > >> OK this didn't work. The hostname method simply causes sipX to see > >> > > them > > > >> as the same gateway so a match on one gateway will be a match on the > >> > > other. > > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> > >> It *ought* to work! Did you use two *different* hostnames whose A > >> > > records give the same IP address? > > > >> Dale > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > sipx-users mailing list [email protected] > > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > > _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
