*bump* On 06/26/2010 12:49 PM, Josh Patten wrote: > *bump* > > On 06/24/2010 05:39 PM, Josh Patten wrote: > >> OK I think I have figured out why this is happening and I think it's a >> bug. What I think is happening is that sipX is processing the non-shared >> branch gateways that match the branch of the calling user BEFORE >> processing the shared gateways even though the shared gateways are >> listed before the non-shared branch gateways in the dial plan. This >> results in sipX skipping over the shared Mediant 1000 gateway and going >> straight to the branch gateway (if it is available). I found this out by >> seeing all my calls routing through my Adtran TA908e's which are used >> for emergency calling when the shared Mediant 1000 is not available. >> >> Can anyone else reproduce this behavior? I am running 4.2.1-018914 >> >> Josh Patten >> Assistant Network Administrator >> Brazos County IT Dept. >> (979) 361-4676 >> >> >> On 6/22/2010 1:04 PM, Picher, Michael wrote: >> >> >>> Yes. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Josh Patten [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 9:57 AM >>>> To: Picher, Michael >>>> Cc: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Use one IP address for multiple gateways in >>>> sipX? >>>> >>>> And this works for location (branch) based call routing? >>>> >>>> Josh Patten >>>> Assistant Network Administrator >>>> Brazos County IT Dept. >>>> (979) 361-4676 >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6/22/2010 5:12 AM, Picher, Michael wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Josh, >>>>> >>>>> I think when I do it I just create a new gateway and use the ip but >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> give >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> it a different gateway name in sipX. >>>>> >>>>> I'm pretty sure that works fine. >>>>> >>>>> Mike >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Patten >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 4:09 PM >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Use one IP address for multiple gateways >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> in >>> >>> >>> >>>>> sipX? >>>>> >>>>> Yes I did: Two different A records (not CNAMEs). I set a different >>>>> branch for each gateway and made sure the "shared" checkbox was not >>>>> checked. The way my system is currently set up is I have one main >>>>> "shared" Audiocodes mediant 1000 with a PRI connection to the >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> outside >>> >>> >>> >>>>> world. In the dial plan I put all the non-shared gateways that sipX >>>>> should try before the main shared gateway (for location based >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> dialing) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> in the dial plan order and then add the non-shared "emergency dial" >>>>> gateways (in the event the main gateway is down) after the shared >>>>> gateway in the dial plan order. >>>>> >>>>> In the case of the gateway that required two hostnames, I have a >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> need >>> >>> >>> >>>>> for two extensions (6177 and 6536) to use that gateway "before" the >>>>> shared gateway and another group of extensions to use it "after" the >>>>> shared gateway so in the event the audiocodes gateway is unavailable >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> the >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> local gateway can be used. What actually happened when I set it up >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> that >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> way was that all of the extensions that pointed to the two different >>>>> hostnames would stop at the first gateway (I am assuming because the >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> IP >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> matched even though I was using A records) that was supposed to be >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> used >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> by the two extensions 6177 and 6536. >>>>> >>>>> Did any of that make sense? What kind of logs should I gather? >>>>> >>>>> Josh Patten >>>>> Assistant Network Administrator >>>>> Brazos County IT Dept. >>>>> (979) 361-4676 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 6/21/2010 2:30 PM, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh Patten >>>>> [[email protected]] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> OK this didn't work. The hostname method simply causes sipX to see >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> them >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> as the same gateway so a match on one gateway will be a match on >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> the >>> >>> >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> other. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> >>>>>> It *ought* to work! Did you use two *different* hostnames whose A >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> records give the same IP address? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Dale >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> sipx-users mailing list [email protected] >>>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users >>>>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users >>>>> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users >> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users >> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ >> >> > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ >
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
