*bump* On 06/24/2010 05:39 PM, Josh Patten wrote: > OK I think I have figured out why this is happening and I think it's a > bug. What I think is happening is that sipX is processing the non-shared > branch gateways that match the branch of the calling user BEFORE > processing the shared gateways even though the shared gateways are > listed before the non-shared branch gateways in the dial plan. This > results in sipX skipping over the shared Mediant 1000 gateway and going > straight to the branch gateway (if it is available). I found this out by > seeing all my calls routing through my Adtran TA908e's which are used > for emergency calling when the shared Mediant 1000 is not available. > > Can anyone else reproduce this behavior? I am running 4.2.1-018914 > > Josh Patten > Assistant Network Administrator > Brazos County IT Dept. > (979) 361-4676 > > > On 6/22/2010 1:04 PM, Picher, Michael wrote: > >> Yes. >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Josh Patten [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 9:57 AM >>> To: Picher, Michael >>> Cc: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Use one IP address for multiple gateways in >>> sipX? >>> >>> And this works for location (branch) based call routing? >>> >>> Josh Patten >>> Assistant Network Administrator >>> Brazos County IT Dept. >>> (979) 361-4676 >>> >>> >>> On 6/22/2010 5:12 AM, Picher, Michael wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Josh, >>>> >>>> I think when I do it I just create a new gateway and use the ip but >>>> >>>> >>> give >>> >>> >>>> it a different gateway name in sipX. >>>> >>>> I'm pretty sure that works fine. >>>> >>>> Mike >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh >>>> >>>> >>> Patten >>> >>> >>>> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 4:09 PM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Use one IP address for multiple gateways >>>> >>>> >> in >> >> >>>> sipX? >>>> >>>> Yes I did: Two different A records (not CNAMEs). I set a different >>>> branch for each gateway and made sure the "shared" checkbox was not >>>> checked. The way my system is currently set up is I have one main >>>> "shared" Audiocodes mediant 1000 with a PRI connection to the >>>> >>>> >> outside >> >> >>>> world. In the dial plan I put all the non-shared gateways that sipX >>>> should try before the main shared gateway (for location based >>>> >>>> >>> dialing) >>> >>> >>>> in the dial plan order and then add the non-shared "emergency dial" >>>> gateways (in the event the main gateway is down) after the shared >>>> gateway in the dial plan order. >>>> >>>> In the case of the gateway that required two hostnames, I have a >>>> >>>> >> need >> >> >>>> for two extensions (6177 and 6536) to use that gateway "before" the >>>> shared gateway and another group of extensions to use it "after" the >>>> shared gateway so in the event the audiocodes gateway is unavailable >>>> >>>> >>> the >>> >>> >>>> local gateway can be used. What actually happened when I set it up >>>> >>>> >>> that >>> >>> >>>> way was that all of the extensions that pointed to the two different >>>> hostnames would stop at the first gateway (I am assuming because the >>>> >>>> >>> IP >>> >>> >>>> matched even though I was using A records) that was supposed to be >>>> >>>> >>> used >>> >>> >>>> by the two extensions 6177 and 6536. >>>> >>>> Did any of that make sense? What kind of logs should I gather? >>>> >>>> Josh Patten >>>> Assistant Network Administrator >>>> Brazos County IT Dept. >>>> (979) 361-4676 >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6/21/2010 2:30 PM, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh Patten >>>> [[email protected]] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> OK this didn't work. The hostname method simply causes sipX to see >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> them >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> as the same gateway so a match on one gateway will be a match on >>>>> >>>>> >> the >> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> other. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> >>>>> It *ought* to work! Did you use two *different* hostnames whose A >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> records give the same IP address? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Dale >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sipx-users mailing list [email protected] >>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users >>>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users >>>> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ >>>> >>>> >>>> > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ >
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
