In theory yes but I've never gotten it to work.

On 06/29/2010 08:43 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Do your AC gateways allow you to bind more than one IP address to them?
> ============================
> Tony Graziano, Manager
> Telephone: 434.984.8430
> Fax: 434.984.8431
>
> Email: [email protected]
>
> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> Fax: 434.984.8427
>
> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [email protected]
> <[email protected]>
> To: Michael Picher<[email protected]>
> Cc: sipx-users<[email protected]>
> Sent: Tue Jun 29 09:42:01 2010
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Use one IP address for multiple gateways in sipX?
>
> This was happening on gateways in different buildings on different
> subnets. I will try to do some work this evening to replicate this and
> get those two files.
>
> On 06/29/2010 01:44 AM, Michael Picher wrote:
>    
>> Josh,
>>
>> In this particular example, do you have multiple gateways that might
>> have the same IP address for this dial plan entry?  I know I told you
>> to do that before but I'm trying to recall a particular problem I had
>> along these same lines.  Grey matter is not cooperating though.
>>
>> I may have had to setup different A records pointing back to the same
>> IP address and then use those when I created the gateways.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Douglas Hubler<[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>  wrote:
>>
>>      On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Josh Patten
>>      <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>  wrote:
>>      >  *bump*
>>      >  On 06/26/2010 12:49 PM, Josh Patten wrote:
>>      >>  *bump*
>>
>>      you're not afraid of the double-bump ;)
>>
>>      >>  On 06/24/2010 05:39 PM, Josh Patten wrote:
>>      >>>  OK I think I have figured out why this is happening and I
>>      think it's a
>>      >>>  bug. What I think is happening is that sipX is processing the
>>      non-shared
>>      >>>  branch gateways that match the branch of the calling user BEFORE
>>      >>>  processing the shared gateways even though the shared gateways are
>>      >>>  listed before the non-shared branch gateways in the dial plan.
>>      This
>>      >>>  results in sipX skipping over the shared Mediant 1000 gateway
>>      and going
>>      >>>  straight to the branch gateway (if it is available). I found
>>      this out by
>>      >>>  seeing all my calls routing through my Adtran TA908e's which
>>      are used
>>      >>>  for emergency calling when the shared Mediant 1000 is not
>>      available.
>>
>>      Can you send before and after of these 2 files
>>
>>       /etc/sipxpbx/mappingrules.xml
>>       /etc/sipxpbx/fallbackrules.xml
>>
>>      to eliminate sipXconfig as problem
>>      _______________________________________________
>>      sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
>>      <mailto:[email protected]>
>>      List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
>>      Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
>>      sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand
>> binary and those who don't.
>>
>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>> blog: http://www.sipxecs.info
>> call: sip:[email protected]<mailto:sip%[email protected]>
>>      

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to