On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:46:35 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: > I think you would be so much better off waiting for 4.4, and adding some > licenses to FS for g.729 then.
That's exciting. I've not kept track of what's coming so wasn't aware of this. Went and looked and read this. http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/G729 That gives us a couple of ways of doing things. Is this system wide or will it be possible to do it by groups? I don't see any mention of this. Sounds like sipx will be able to do it's own transcoding in the near future then, which means being able to give remote users codec choices perhaps. The licensing installation sounds a bit involved considering that managing licenses, actually, mainly adding more channels will probably be an ongoing thing. Each license is actually one encoder and one decoder so one license per call right? I'm mainly concerned with in-network calls, I believe they are called 'inter office' calls, between two people. I'd love to offload sipx in another way, by letting it act as a switchboard, connecting calls together and getting out of the picture so it's not using my bandwidth. The two remotes would then talk to each other and only accounting information would come to sipx. Don't think I've seen such a product/project yet. Dreaming :). You will have issues with renegotiating and > such that you will want to make transcoding possible with the media server. > This approach using FS does not work in 4.21 because FS does not support > that licensing in 4.21. > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:41 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:55:39 -0500, Matt White wrote: >>> Each phone or phone group can have the codecs configured. Simply put >>> G.729 >>> as the highest perferred codec and the phone will use that codec first. >>> >>> you can also restrict which codecs SipxBridge allows and restrict that >>> to >>> G.729 as well. But that would not affect intraoffice calls. >>> >> >> Thing is, the remotes would have various soft-phones and sip phones. So >> basically, I could in fact do this but would have to limit what remotes >> are using? >> >> As to intra office, you mean in-network, sip-to-sip calls? Because, those >> are the ones I'm trying to control most. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
