It is not permissions. It's just that the Proxy has a haphazard way of
choosing its gateway or rule order sometimes.

=====================
Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: [email protected]
Fax: 434.326.5325
Email: [email protected]

LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426

sip: [email protected]

Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://support.myitdepartment.net

Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net

Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/ tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4
On Apr 11, 2011 1:38 PM, "Michael Scheidell" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On 4/11/11 1:30 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
>>
>> I would simply create the rules plus 1 and any number of digits and
>> have the resulting call send magic suffix only.
>>
>>
> Thanks, seems to work.
> put in two custom rules:
> p1: rule is +1 and 10 digits, () permissions long distance. outpulse
> 'nothing' plus suffix.
> p2: rule is + and any digits, () permissions international, outpulse
> 011, plus suffix.
>
> was able to hit 'return call' on a +1 (us) number and a +32
> international number.
> they went out their respective gateways.
>
> this doesn't seem to help inbound calls. (haven't messed with patton sbc
> yet, and itsp has not called back to fix E.164 yet)
>
> is it the permissions?
> I noticed that our inbound did call xlation custom rule doesn't have any
> permissions on it.
>
>
> --
> Michael Scheidell, CTO
> o: 561-999-5000
> d: 561-948-2259
> ISN: 1259*1300
> >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
>
> * Best Intrusion Prevention Product, Networks Product Guide
> * Certified SNORT Integrator
> * Hot Company Award, World Executive Alliance
> * Best in Email Security, 2010 Network Products Guide
> * King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
> For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
> ______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to