You have to feel it to understand it.
But Michel doesn't need braille anymore, he can see now, thanks for the 
patch.

Paul



From:
Nathaniel Watkins <[email protected]>
To:
Discussion list for users of sipXecs software 
<[email protected]>
Date:
16-09-2011 15:09
Subject:
Re: [sipx-users] CallCentric Limitations
Sent by:
[email protected]



Isn’t seeing brail somewhat ‘pointless’
 
From: [email protected] [
mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Picher
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 9:02 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] CallCentric Limitations
 
Now I see...
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:53 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:



Tony Graziano <[email protected]> wrote on 16-09-2011 14:28:08:


> sorry traveling does that 
> On Sep 16, 2011 8:25 AM, "Michael Picher" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thanks, the "Nehos from au andbe" that threw me. I can't understand 
why,
> > it's perfectly clear.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony 
Graziano
> > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 8:20 AM
> > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] CallCentric Limitations
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Nehos is an isp and trunk provider"down under".
> > 
> > callcentric has a unique us offering to au. all im suggesting is that 
there
> > are alternatives.
> > 
> > all you really needed to do was turn upside down to look at it because
> > you're at the other end of the world from them.
> > 
> > On Sep 16, 2011 8:17 AM, "Michael Picher" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Could I get that last message in braille please?
> >> 
> >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Tony Graziano
> > <[email protected]
> >>> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> callcentric is not rfc3261 compliant. if you search the archives of 
the
> >>> user list you'll see a lot of discussion to that end.
> >>>
> >>> I think the only thing they normally bring to the table are low 
rates
> >>> australia. at the same time you could just get a truck with Nehos 
from au
> >>> andbe done with that.
> >>> On Sep 16, 2011 8:05 AM, "Tim Byng" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> > I have found that transfers (blind or assisted) and conference 
calls do
> >>> not
> >>> > work either. Is this to be expected with CallCentric? If so, then 
I
> > guess
> >>> > they're not an option.
> >>> >
> >>> > All of this works as expected with voip.ms.
> >>> >
> >>> > Has anyone been able to get this to work with CallCentric?
> >>> >
> >>> > Regards,
> >>> > Tim
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Tim Byng <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> I was contemplating not putting CallCentric in the subject of 
this
> >>> email,
> >>> >> as I know they're generally not recommended with sipXecs and some 
of
> > you
> >>> may
> >>> >> not even read this. However, I'm running out of options. I won't 
get
> >>> into it
> >>> >> here, but my choices are very limited, so if I can get 
CallCentric to
> >>> work
> >>> >> with sipXecs, I'm happy.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> So far I have the basics working. Both inbound and outbound calls 
seem
> >>> to
> >>> >> be working as expected (minus the inbound caller id name, but 
I've
> > only
> >>> >> tested one number so far). However, I just ran into a problem 
where an
> >>> >> external line will not ring when I set a call forwarding rule for 
a
> >>> user.
> >>> >> Here are the scenarios:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> - OK: Landline -> voip.ms DID -> sipXecs -> internal extension ->
> >>> >> voip.ms -> external number
> >>> >> - OK: Landline -> callcentric DID -> sipXecs -> internal 
extension ->
> >>> >> voip.ms -> external number
> >>> >> - Not OK: Landline -> voip.ms DID -> sipXecs -> internal 
extension ->
> >>> >> callcentric -> external number
> >>> >> - Not OK: Landline -> callcentric DID -> sipXecs -> internal 
extension
> >>> >> -> callcentric -> external number
> >>> >>
> >>> >> In all cases, the internal extension rings. However, when 
callcentric
> > is
> >>> >> used to forward the number, the external number does not ring.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Is this a known issue with CallCentric? If someone was able to 
get
> > this
> >>> to
> >>> >> work, what steps did you take?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Are there any other limitations with CallCentric that I should 
know
> >>> about?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Regards,
> >>> >> Tim
> >>> >>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> sipx-users mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> >>>
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Michael Picher
> >> eZuce
> >> Director of Technical Services
> >> O.978-296-1005 X2015
> >> M.207-956-0262
> >> @mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher>
> >> www.ezuce.com
> > _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/


 
-- 
Michael Picher
eZuce
Director of Technical Services
O.978-296-1005 X2015 
M.207-956-0262
@mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher> 
www.ezuce.com

This message and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the 
individual(s) or entity named. If you are not the intended individual(s) 
or entity named you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or reliance upon its contents is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this in error, please notify the sender, delete the 
original, and destroy all copies. Email transmissions cannot be guaranteed 
to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, 
lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Garrett 
County Government therefore does not accept any liability for any errors 
or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of 
email transmission.


Garrett County Government,
203 South Fourth Street, Courthouse, Oakland, Maryland 21550 
www.garrettcounty.org_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

<<image/gif>>

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to