oooOOOooo... massive sarcasm & puns in the same thread! love it! On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Nathaniel Watkins < [email protected]> wrote:
> Isn’t seeing brail somewhat ‘pointless’**** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Michael Picher > *Sent:* Friday, September 16, 2011 9:02 AM > > *To:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] CallCentric Limitations**** > > ** ** > > Now I see...**** > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:53 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:**** > > > > > Tony Graziano <[email protected]> wrote on 16-09-2011 14:28:08: > > > > sorry traveling does that **** > > > On Sep 16, 2011 8:25 AM, "Michael Picher" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks, the "Nehos from au andbe" that threw me. I can't understand > why, > > > it's perfectly clear. > > > > > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > > [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > On Behalf Of Tony Graziano > > > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 8:20 AM > > > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > > > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] CallCentric Limitations > > > > > > > > > > > > Nehos is an isp and trunk provider"down under". > > > > > > callcentric has a unique us offering to au. all im suggesting is that > there > > > are alternatives. > > > > > > all you really needed to do was turn upside down to look at it because > > > you're at the other end of the world from them. > > > > > > On Sep 16, 2011 8:17 AM, "Michael Picher" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Could I get that last message in braille please? > > >> > > >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Tony Graziano > > > <[email protected] > > >>> wrote: > > >> > > >>> callcentric is not rfc3261 compliant. if you search the archives of > the > > >>> user list you'll see a lot of discussion to that end. > > >>> > > >>> I think the only thing they normally bring to the table are low rates > > >>> australia. at the same time you could just get a truck with Nehos > from au > > >>> andbe done with that. > > >>> On Sep 16, 2011 8:05 AM, "Tim Byng" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > I have found that transfers (blind or assisted) and conference > calls do > > >>> not > > >>> > work either. Is this to be expected with CallCentric? If so, then I > > > guess > > >>> > they're not an option. > > >>> > > > >>> > All of this works as expected with voip.ms. > > >>> > > > >>> > Has anyone been able to get this to work with CallCentric? > > >>> > > > >>> > Regards, > > >>> > Tim > > >>> > > > >>> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Tim Byng <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> >> I was contemplating not putting CallCentric in the subject of this > > >>> email, > > >>> >> as I know they're generally not recommended with sipXecs and some > of > > > you > > >>> may > > >>> >> not even read this. However, I'm running out of options. I won't > get > > >>> into it > > >>> >> here, but my choices are very limited, so if I can get CallCentric > to > > >>> work > > >>> >> with sipXecs, I'm happy. > > >>> >> > > >>> >> So far I have the basics working. Both inbound and outbound calls > seem > > >>> to > > >>> >> be working as expected (minus the inbound caller id name, but I've > > > only > > >>> >> tested one number so far). However, I just ran into a problem > where an > > >>> >> external line will not ring when I set a call forwarding rule for > a > > >>> user. > > >>> >> Here are the scenarios: > > >>> >> > > >>> >> - OK: Landline -> voip.ms DID -> sipXecs -> internal extension -> > > >>> >> voip.ms -> external number > > >>> >> - OK: Landline -> callcentric DID -> sipXecs -> internal extension > -> > > >>> >> voip.ms -> external number > > >>> >> - Not OK: Landline -> voip.ms DID -> sipXecs -> internal > extension -> > > >>> >> callcentric -> external number > > >>> >> - Not OK: Landline -> callcentric DID -> sipXecs -> internal > extension > > >>> >> -> callcentric -> external number > > >>> >> > > >>> >> In all cases, the internal extension rings. However, when > callcentric > > > is > > >>> >> used to forward the number, the external number does not ring. > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Is this a known issue with CallCentric? If someone was able to get > > > this > > >>> to > > >>> >> work, what steps did you take? > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Are there any other limitations with CallCentric that I should > know > > >>> about? > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Regards, > > >>> >> Tim > > >>> >> > > >>> > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> sipx-users mailing list > > >>> [email protected] > > >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Michael Picher > > >> eZuce > > >> Director of Technical Services > > >> O.978-296-1005 X2015 > > >> M.207-956-0262 > > >> @mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher> > > >> www.ezuce.com > > > _______________________________________________ > > sipx-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/**** > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/**** > > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- > Michael Picher > eZuce > Director of Technical Services > O.978-296-1005 X2015 > M.207-956-0262 > @mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher> > www.ezuce.com**** > > ------------------------------ > This message and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the > individual(s) or entity named. If you are not the intended individual(s) or > entity named you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, > distribution or reliance upon its contents is strictly prohibited. If you > have received this in error, please notify the sender, delete the original, > and destroy all copies. Email transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be > secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, > destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Garrett County > Government therefore does not accept any liability for any errors or > omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of email > transmission. > > > Garrett County Government, > 203 South Fourth Street, Courthouse, Oakland, Maryland 21550 > www.garrettcounty.org > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > -- Michael Picher eZuce Director of Technical Services O.978-296-1005 X2015 M.207-956-0262 @mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher> www.ezuce.com
<<image001.gif>>
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
