Hi Guys, To resolve this problem I have changed DNS configuration from:
_sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800 IN SRV 1 0 5060 ps0sipx01.webcti.local. _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800 IN SRV 1 0 5060 ps0sipx02.webcti.local. _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800 IN SRV 1 0 5060 ps0sipx03.webcti.local. To: _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800 IN SRV 1 33 5060 ps0sipx01.webcti.local. _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800 IN SRV 1 33 5060 ps0sipx02.webcti.local. _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800 IN SRV 1 33 5060 ps0sipx03.webcti.local. Now in sipxecs GUI I can see all my users load balanced between the three servers and load balance value of 2.78 which is good. I hope it will help others people. Best regards Cyril 2011/9/8 Todd Hodgen <[email protected]> > Counterpath seems to be a company struggling in many ways. Their reseller > program was sunk over a year ago. So, resellers such as myself has no > motivation to promote their product. Of course the support issues are now > famous.**** > > ** ** > > It may well be time to start collaborating towards integration with Link, > and forget about Counterpath until they get serious about their business.* > *** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *[email protected] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:11 AM > *To:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > *Cc:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software; > [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] Bria provisioning and SRV load balance**** > > ** ** > > I've got slightly better experience with Counterpath. > I just send mails to [email protected] and then wait, remind them, > wait (reat n times) and eventually, maybe, the problem gets sorted. > But for example the XMPP part of Bria is still far from stable although > it's known for about half a year now. > > The product is also not developing fast enough, I think Counterpath is more > focussed on other things. > Also as a result of this I'm afraid (scared/shocked) that our company will > jump on the Lync bandwagon > because there's no good SIP video and collaboration client (and Msoft is > pushing really really hard). > > Paul > > Kyle Haefner <[email protected]> wrote on 07-09-2011 17:22:06: > > > HA! When I have complained, I've always gotten the response; "We can > > fix this for you if you want to pay us for a custom build." > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] > > >> > > >> If the sip domain has more then 1 sip SRV > > >> records with equal priority then Bria will pick one of them. I do > > >> remember that newer Bria's always picks the first SRV, > > > > > > That is to say, Bria does not properly implement SRV records. > > > > > > You should complain to the vendor. > > > > > > Dale > > > _______________________________________________ > > > sipx-users mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Kyle Haefner, M.S. > > Communication Systems Programmer > > Colorado State University > > Fort Collins, CO > > Phone: 970-491-1012 > > Email: [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > > sipx-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/**** > ------------------------------ > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3882 - Release Date: 09/07/11*** > * > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
