So Brian doesn't like a weight of 0...  interesting.
On Sep 21, 2011 8:49 AM, "cyril constantin" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> To resolve this problem I have changed DNS configuration from:
>
> _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800 IN SRV 1 0 5060
> ps0sipx01.webcti.local.
> _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800 IN SRV 1 0 5060
> ps0sipx02.webcti.local.
> _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800 IN SRV 1 0 5060
> ps0sipx03.webcti.local.
>
> To:
>
> _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800 IN SRV 1 33 5060
> ps0sipx01.webcti.local.
> _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800 IN SRV 1 33 5060
> ps0sipx02.webcti.local.
> _sip._tcp.webcti.local. 1800 IN SRV 1 33 5060
> ps0sipx03.webcti.local.
>
> Now in sipxecs GUI I can see all my users load balanced between the three
> servers and load balance value of 2.78 which is good.
>
> I hope it will help others people.
>
> Best regards
>
> Cyril
>
> 2011/9/8 Todd Hodgen <[email protected]>
>
>> Counterpath seems to be a company struggling in many ways. Their reseller
>> program was sunk over a year ago. So, resellers such as myself has no
>> motivation to promote their product. Of course the support issues are now
>> famous.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> It may well be time to start collaborating towards integration with Link,
>> and forget about Counterpath until they get serious about their
business.*
>> ***
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *[email protected]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:11 AM
>> *To:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
>> *Cc:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software;
>> [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] Bria provisioning and SRV load balance****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I've got slightly better experience with Counterpath.
>> I just send mails to [email protected] and then wait, remind them,
>> wait (reat n times) and eventually, maybe, the problem gets sorted.
>> But for example the XMPP part of Bria is still far from stable although
>> it's known for about half a year now.
>>
>> The product is also not developing fast enough, I think Counterpath is
more
>> focussed on other things.
>> Also as a result of this I'm afraid (scared/shocked) that our company
will
>> jump on the Lync bandwagon
>> because there's no good SIP video and collaboration client (and Msoft is
>> pushing really really hard).
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> Kyle Haefner <[email protected]> wrote on 07-09-2011 17:22:06:
>>
>> > HA! When I have complained, I've always gotten the response; "We can
>> > fix this for you if you want to pay us for a custom build."
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >> From: [email protected] [[email protected]]
>> > >>
>> > >> If the sip domain has more then 1 sip SRV
>> > >> records with equal priority then Bria will pick one of them. I do
>> > >> remember that newer Bria's always picks the first SRV,
>> > >
>> > > That is to say, Bria does not properly implement SRV records.
>> > >
>> > > You should complain to the vendor.
>> > >
>> > > Dale
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > sipx-users mailing list
>> > > [email protected]
>> > > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Kyle Haefner, M.S.
>> > Communication Systems Programmer
>> > Colorado State University
>> > Fort Collins, CO
>> > Phone: 970-491-1012
>> > Email: [email protected]
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > sipx-users mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/****
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3882 - Release Date:
09/07/11***
>> *
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>>
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to