> Sigh what?   Mike, read about PRI -

Sigh... because you took the time to agree with Tony, giving me grief while at 
the same time pointing out that you were not doing that. Of course you were. 
Since Tony had already made his point, why did you need to bring it up again? 

You then post a separate reply to the original question when just before that, 
you told me you didn't know what I was talking about. 

Sigh because as soon as I point out the obvious such as I am now having to do, 
a few of you must at all costs have fun with this, turning the persons post 
into garbage making points like 'we need to understand'. Does someone else feel 
the need still?

Of course you know what I was asking about, I've seen plenty of people talking 
about virtual PRI's. Who the heck would not know that a VPRI might simply be an 
abbreviation. Doesn't seem to be at the moment but give it time maybe :).

Bottom line is that there are a few old timers on this list that seem to feel 
the need to be hard nosed to people. Why? Maybe a few of the users are simply 
too freaking serious for no good reason. Give it a rest. There is no reason to 
be like that with ANYONE on this list. 
No one makes you reply to anything, you don't have to. If you don't like how 
someone posts something, it's not your place to be the teacher or know it all 
and tell them how they need to learn everything about VoIP before ever taking 
the chance of using the wrong term while asking a question. God forbid!

>That's all I'm saying, and I think that is
> what Tony was asking - what is it exactly.

A virtual PRI is really just a billing method for a SIP trunk. Figured pretty 
much anyone on this list would know that.
The question really was, how do I set up sipx so that I can use IP 
authentication to the ITSP over user/password. 

Anyways, moving on...




> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 7:08 PM
> To: sipx-users
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] flowroute VPRI IP authentication
>
> <sigh>
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:55:11 -0800, Todd Hodgen wrote:
>> Yes, but what is a virtual PRI?   Since PRI is an ISDN standard, what is
> the
>> non-standard derivative that comes out of a Virtual PRI?   What is it
>> exactly?
>>
>> Is it maybe a PRI that is fed out of device that is actually fed via a T1
>> with SIP trunks on it?   If it is, its still a PRI, conforming to the PRI
>> standards, as it should.
>>
>> I believe what you are referring to is some companies marketing name
>> they use for a service they provide.  I don't think anyone is giving
>> you grief, we just have no idea what you are talking about since we
>> haven't had the pleasure of reading the material you have, and really
>> haven't a clue what this VPRI is.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>> [email protected]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 3:02 PM
>> To: sipx-users
>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] flowroute VPRI IP authentication
>>
>> On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:20:57 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote:
>>> I dont know VPRI means. If you use terms noone but you might
>>> understand you might explain it a bit. Throwing that aside...
>>>
>> When I don't use the right terms, I get grief and when I use the terms
>> I'm seeing in docs, I still get grief :).
>> I would have called it Virtual PRI but flowroute itself seems to call
>> it VPRI for short.
>>
>>> flowroute is a two-edged sword: Use the bandwidth.com template and
>>> change the bandwidth.com gateway stuff to your flowroute gateway.
>>> make sure flowroute is swet to send to your ip address and port 5080.
>>> Very
>> simple.
>>
>> I'll take a look at this.
>>
>>> If you use dual wan with flowroute you may have issues if you route
>>> netblocks or providers via specific wan ports.
>>>
>> Flowroute will be the only gateway these sipx servers will know and have.
>>
>>> flowroute does not control
>>> the majority of their network and hence, RTP does not come from the
>>> same IP as the gateway. You pretty much have to open everything to
>>> use flowroute if you had been in locked down mode.
>>>
>> I didn't know this about them and to date, have always used an IP
>> allow rule for them.
>> Guess I've been lucky, haven't heard of any missed calls.
>>
>> These servers won't have any remote users but I wanted to have a bit
>> of security in place so figured I would block all but
>> sip.flowroute.com. Now I seem to have a new problem.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 5:10 PM, [email protected]
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I need to install 4 separate sipx systems in four separate locations.
>>>> No interoffice communications.
>>> All of the sipx systems could benefit from the use of a VPRI rather
>>> than traditional.
>>>
>>> I use ITSP's for individual lines when we need an area code that our
>>> local telco cannot handle.
>>> On sipx, I usually just  create an ITSP device in the gateway section
>>> and let it authenticate via user name/password.
>>>
>>> In this case, due to the number of lines per server (4 to 8), it
>>> doesn't seem like a good idea to authenticate each and every DID
>>> individually for example and would prefer using an IP based
>>> authentication for the whole server.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I'll be using flowroute for the systems but am not sure how to
>>>> configure sipx to authenticate once based on IP over a user
>>>> name/password. I don't see anything which would allow me to do this
>>>> in the Gateway configuration section.
>>>>
>>>
>>>> Can someone shed some light on this please.
>>>>
>>> Thanks very much.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sipx-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to