i see nothing wrong with saying: "I don't know VPRI means. If you use terms noone but you might understand you might explain it a bit. Throwing that aside..."
what i don't enjoy is the fact that this post has nothing to do with the original subject. I suggest you start a new post with an apt subject... ok gerald? happy 2012. On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 4:14 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > And a happy NEW YEAR.......(I will be in 2012 hours earlier then most of > you :o) > > And a BIG thanks to Tony and Todd and Michel and Dale and George and > Joegen and Martin and all the others that provide answers and fixes. > I am grateful that they support this community, learn from these people. > > BTW: Sometimes replies can hurt, but learning comes at a price, better a > painful answer then no answer, > get over the pain and learn from people that went through some pain to get > to a certain knowledge level. > > BTW2: And now we know that VPRI is a stupid word for SIP-trunk, thanks for > the info. > > Paul > > > > > > On Friday, December 30, 2011, Gerald Harper <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yup realized right after I clicked send. Oh well. (can't we all just > get > > > along?) > > > > > > > Well let's see - on one hand we have Tony and Todd's contributions > > and replies to list that are very helpful without question (even > > sometimes they could hurt feelings). On the other hand you're > > watching the list and reply offline to others saying that it sucks > > and calls are dropped (btw is there any jira opened, trace collected > > so we could take a look at?) and you ended by not recommending > > SipXecs to customers. As a project contributor I don't feel this is > > the right attitude for an open source project and I encourage you to > > become active in reporting issues instead just watching mailing list > > and hope something it is solved > > > > Thanks > > George > > > > > > > > > On 12/29/2011 8:54 PM, Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public) wrote: > > >> Your post went to the list... > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Gerald Harper<[email protected]> > > >> Sender: [email protected] > > >> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:51:36 > > >> To:<[email protected]>; Discussion list for users of sipXecs > software< > > [email protected]> > > >> Reply-To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > > >> <[email protected]> > > >> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] flowroute VPRI IP authentication > > >> > > >> Off list (so as not to piss anyone off)... you are so right about how > > >> people are treated on this list. One of the reasons I stopped posting > > >> here and recommending sipx to customers. The other being the random > > >> dropped calls issue from two years ago, I follow the list only to see > if > > >> the problem has been fixed. Neither have IMHO. > > >> > > >> I hope it all works for you, and by the way I knew what you meant as > > >> soon as I read it. > > >> > > >> On 12/29/2011 8:12 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > >>>> Sigh what? Mike, read about PRI - > > >>> Sigh... because you took the time to agree with Tony, giving me > > grief while at the same time pointing out that you were not doing > > that. Of course you were. Since Tony had already made his point, why > > did you need to bring it up again? > > >>> > > >>> You then post a separate reply to the original question when > > just before that, you told me you didn't know what I was talking about. > > >>> > > >>> Sigh because as soon as I point out the obvious such as I am now > > having to do, a few of you must at all costs have fun with this, > > turning the persons post into garbage making points like 'we need to > > understand'. Does someone else feel the need still? > > >>> > > >>> Of course you know what I was asking about, I've seen plenty of > > people talking about virtual PRI's. Who the heck would not know that > > a VPRI might simply be an abbreviation. Doesn't seem to be at the > > moment but give it time maybe :). > > >>> > > >>> Bottom line is that there are a few old timers on this list that > > seem to feel the need to be hard nosed to people. Why? Maybe a few > > of the users are simply too freaking serious for no good reason. > > Give it a rest. There is no reason to be like that with ANYONE on this > list. > > >>> No one makes you reply to anything, you don't have to. If you > > don't like how someone posts something, it's not your place to be > > the teacher or know it all and tell them how they need to learn > > everything about VoIP before ever taking the chance of using the > > wrong term while asking a question. God forbid! > > >>> > > >>>> That's all I'm saying, and I think that is > > >>>> what Tony was asking - what is it exactly. > > >>> A virtual PRI is really just a billing method for a SIP trunk. > > Figured pretty much anyone on this list would know that. > > >>> The question really was, how do I set up sipx so that I can use > > IP authentication to the ITSP over user/password. > > >>> > > >>> Anyways, moving on... > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> -----Original Message----- > > >>>> From: [email protected] > > >>>> [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]> > ] On Behalf Of > > > >>>> [email protected] > > >>>> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 7:08 PM > > >>>> To: sipx-users > > >>>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] flowroute VPRI IP authentication > > >>>> > > >>>> <sigh> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:55:11 -0800, Todd Hodgen wrote: > > >>>>> Yes, but what is a virtual PRI? Since PRI is an ISDN standard, > what is > > >>>> the > > >>>>> non-standard derivative that comes out of a Virtual PRI? What is > it > > >>>>> exactly? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Is it maybe a PRI that is fed out of device that is actually > > fed via a T1 > > >>>>> with SIP _______________________________________________ > > > sipx-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > List Archive: > http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: [email protected] Fax: 434.465.6833 Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: [email protected] Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet Fax services!
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
