On Friday, December 30, 2011, Gerald Harper <[email protected]> wrote: > Yup realized right after I clicked send. Oh well. (can't we all just get > along?) >
Well let's see - on one hand we have Tony and Todd's contributions and replies to list that are very helpful without question (even sometimes they could hurt feelings). On the other hand you're watching the list and reply offline to others saying that it sucks and calls are dropped (btw is there any jira opened, trace collected so we could take a look at?) and you ended by not recommending SipXecs to customers. As a project contributor I don't feel this is the right attitude for an open source project and I encourage you to become active in reporting issues instead just watching mailing list and hope something it is solved Thanks George > On 12/29/2011 8:54 PM, Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public) wrote: >> Your post went to the list... >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Gerald Harper<[email protected]> >> Sender: [email protected] >> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:51:36 >> To:<[email protected]>; Discussion list for users of sipXecs software< [email protected]> >> Reply-To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] flowroute VPRI IP authentication >> >> Off list (so as not to piss anyone off)... you are so right about how >> people are treated on this list. One of the reasons I stopped posting >> here and recommending sipx to customers. The other being the random >> dropped calls issue from two years ago, I follow the list only to see if >> the problem has been fixed. Neither have IMHO. >> >> I hope it all works for you, and by the way I knew what you meant as >> soon as I read it. >> >> On 12/29/2011 8:12 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>>> Sigh what? Mike, read about PRI - >>> Sigh... because you took the time to agree with Tony, giving me grief while at the same time pointing out that you were not doing that. Of course you were. Since Tony had already made his point, why did you need to bring it up again? >>> >>> You then post a separate reply to the original question when just before that, you told me you didn't know what I was talking about. >>> >>> Sigh because as soon as I point out the obvious such as I am now having to do, a few of you must at all costs have fun with this, turning the persons post into garbage making points like 'we need to understand'. Does someone else feel the need still? >>> >>> Of course you know what I was asking about, I've seen plenty of people talking about virtual PRI's. Who the heck would not know that a VPRI might simply be an abbreviation. Doesn't seem to be at the moment but give it time maybe :). >>> >>> Bottom line is that there are a few old timers on this list that seem to feel the need to be hard nosed to people. Why? Maybe a few of the users are simply too freaking serious for no good reason. Give it a rest. There is no reason to be like that with ANYONE on this list. >>> No one makes you reply to anything, you don't have to. If you don't like how someone posts something, it's not your place to be the teacher or know it all and tell them how they need to learn everything about VoIP before ever taking the chance of using the wrong term while asking a question. God forbid! >>> >>>> That's all I'm saying, and I think that is >>>> what Tony was asking - what is it exactly. >>> A virtual PRI is really just a billing method for a SIP trunk. Figured pretty much anyone on this list would know that. >>> The question really was, how do I set up sipx so that I can use IP authentication to the ITSP over user/password. >>> >>> Anyways, moving on... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >>>> [email protected] >>>> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 7:08 PM >>>> To: sipx-users >>>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] flowroute VPRI IP authentication >>>> >>>> <sigh> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:55:11 -0800, Todd Hodgen wrote: >>>>> Yes, but what is a virtual PRI? Since PRI is an ISDN standard, what is >>>> the >>>>> non-standard derivative that comes out of a Virtual PRI? What is it >>>>> exactly? >>>>> >>>>> Is it maybe a PRI that is fed out of device that is actually fed via a T1 >>>>> with SIP
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
