Yep - If Appia says 5080 isn't being done - and Tony says it is...it sounds like those two parties are the ones that need to 'duke it out'. Of course, Tony really has no reason to, other than to show everyone what a loveable guy he really is (you know, deep, deep down...)
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 11:21 AM To: sipx-users Subject: Re: [sipx-users] UPDATE Re: Anyone using appia IP auth, port 5080 On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:50:05 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: > Im not going to get involved. Its a direct conflict of interest since > I am not the reseller. I thought Nathaniel meant to touch bases with appia about the port 5080 info so I'm not stuck in the middle. My whole objective was simply to confirm whether they had or did not have port 5080 services. My offer of calling was that if it would help *you*, then I was willing to do that. As far as helping and that being a conflict of interest, I don't see it. Anyone can help anyone out if they have useful information to share. That's the point of a mailing list. The rest is in my updated ticket with appia so have to wait and see if this nonsense continues or finally gets resolved today. Mike > I will add that to send any calls through appia you have to be sending > a callerid that they have on your account, you would see the decline > message in your sip trace if you are looking at that or proxy logs, > but that type is typical for some itsp's and only noteworthy IF you can't > send calls. > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:43 AM, [email protected] > <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:13:06 -0400, Nathaniel Watkins wrote: >> Sounds like you should see if Tony would be willing to be on a >> conference call with you and appia... >> > >> If it's worth it to Tony, I don't have any problem with that. I only >> mentioned what I've learned as I go or was told. >> > Either way, what's interesting so far is that our weekend got wasted > because it's not working. Flowroute and Voip.ms both work fine but > appia only works one way. I responded to the original ticket where > they told me someone would be keeping an eye on it all weekend and > guess what, I've not heard from anyone since sending the reply. > > >> I was told by sales to call instead of emailing if I wanted faster >> service but when I asked support about that, they snickered that >> someone in sales would tell me that. >> > I hate being in the middle all the time. > > Mike > >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:sipx-users- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano >> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 1:12 PM >> To: [email protected]; Discussion list for users of sipXecs software >> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] UPDATE Re: Anyone using appia IP auth, port >> 5080 >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:05 PM, >> [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> and I relayed this to them, but they have a horrible >>> helpdesk/communications platform >>> >> >> BTW, this is very true. However, they continuously tell me that they >> are working on a GUI and a portal for their new SBC which allows >> instant provisioning of everything, coming to a screen near you... >> who knows when >> :) >> >> >> One gets tired of hearing that and at some point stops listening. >> >> >> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: >> >> >> Telephone: 434.984.8426 >> >> >> sip: [email protected] >> >> >> Helpdesk Customers: >> http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net >> >> >> Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net >> >> >>> This message and any files transmitted with it are intended only for >>> the >> individual(s) or entity named. If you are not the intended >> individual(s) or entity named you are hereby notified that any >> disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon its contents is >> strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please >> notify the sender, delete the original, and destroy all copies. Email >> transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as >> information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive >> late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Garrett County Government >> therefore does not accept any liability for any errors or omissions >> in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of email >> transmission. >> >> >> Garrett County Government, >> 203 South Fourth Street, Courthouse, Oakland, Maryland 21550 >> www.garrettcounty.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
