On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 01:45:16PM -0600, Brian Elliott Finley wrote:I'm ready to commit the postinstall script stuff, but it's invasive enough to be considered a new release feature, and not a bug fix.
I think it's time to branch. You OK with that?
If the goal is to make 3.2.1 based on 2.4.25, then i'd prefer to merge in the 2.4.25 branch first. Is that the goal?
Well, I guess I'm asking for confirmation first. Do you think we should commit "features" and call it 3.2.1?
I'd consider the 2.4.25 a bug fix, but the postscript support a "feature".
To be explicit, and now that I've gathered my thoughts a bit better, I'd like to: - branch at the v3_2_0 tag (dann) - commit the 2.4.25 stuff as a bug fix (dann) - tag it as v3_2_1 (finley) - release it as v3_2_1 (finley) - commit postscript support to head (finley) - merge forward 2.4.25 to head (dann) - release head as v3_3_0 -- unstable (finley)
You good with that?
gcc-3.2 has been dropped from sid, so I'll be moving the debian packages that way this weekend anyway.
--
---------------------------------------------------------
Brian Elliott Finley Argonne, MCS Division Phone: 630.631.6621 http://thefinleys.com
gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 10F8EE52
---------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Sisuite-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel
