On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 09:26:55PM -0600, Brian Elliott Finley wrote:To be explicit, and now that I've gathered my thoughts a bit better, I'd like to:
I'd rather commit the 2.4.25 stuff first, so I only have to do one merge.
- branch at the v3_2_0 tag (dann)
I think we should then branch v3_2_x at HEAD, this way all the changes that have gone in since 3.2.0 will be in both the devel and stable series.
Ok. The only thing that bugs me a little about this is that v3_2_x won't start at v3_2_0, but at v3_2_1. I'm fine with this for this time, but for our next feature release (3.4), I'd like to branch right at v3_4_0 as soon as we release it.
Go for it -- lemme know when I can proceed with the (finley) bits below.
Cheers, -Brian
- commit the 2.4.25 stuff as a bug fix (dann)(will already have been done)
- tag it as v3_2_1 (finley)ok
- release it as v3_2_1 (finley)ok
- commit postscript support to head (finley)ok
- merge forward 2.4.25 to head (dann)(won't be necessary)
- release head as v3_3_0 -- unstable (finley)ok
--
---------------------------------------------------------
Brian Elliott Finley Argonne, MCS Division Phone: 630.631.6621 http://thefinleys.com
gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 10F8EE52
---------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Sisuite-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel
