On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 10:28:57AM -0500, Brian Elliott Finley wrote:Thus spake Dann Frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 09:26:55PM -0600, Brian Elliott Finley wrote:
>>To be explicit, and now that I've gathered my thoughts a bit better, I'd
>>like to:
>
>I'd rather commit the 2.4.25 stuff first, so I only have to do one merge.
>
>>- branch at the v3_2_0 tag (dann)
>
>I think we should then branch v3_2_x at HEAD, this way all the changes >that have
>gone in since 3.2.0 will be in both the devel and stable series.
Ok. The only thing that bugs me a little about this is that v3_2_x won't start at v3_2_0, but at v3_2_1. I'm fine with this for this time, but for our next feature release (3.4), I'd like to branch right at v3_4_0 as soon as we release it.
What will that buy us, besides potentially extra work?
We know we're going to have to branch, so we may as well do it at a logical point. Perhaps there is no practical benefit.
--
---------------------------------------------------------
Brian Elliott Finley Argonne, MCS Division Phone: 630.631.6621 http://thefinleys.com
gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 10F8EE52
---------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Sisuite-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel
