On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 10:28:57AM -0500, Brian Elliott Finley wrote: > Thus spake Dann Frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 09:26:55PM -0600, Brian Elliott Finley wrote: > >>To be explicit, and now that I've gathered my thoughts a bit better, I'd > >>like to: > > > >I'd rather commit the 2.4.25 stuff first, so I only have to do one merge. > > > >>- branch at the v3_2_0 tag (dann) > > > >I think we should then branch v3_2_x at HEAD, this way all the changes > >that have > >gone in since 3.2.0 will be in both the devel and stable series. > > Ok. The only thing that bugs me a little about this is that v3_2_x > won't start at v3_2_0, but at v3_2_1. I'm fine with this for this time, > but for our next feature release (3.4), I'd like to branch right at > v3_4_0 as soon as we release it.
What will that buy us, besides potentially extra work? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Sisuite-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel
