For sure I will take care of bug reports and small feature requests. But as I said, I am not using the command line client myself, so my interest to push it's development is relatively rare.
Ingo > This was my initial fear. Having parts in Slide that no one knows about > any more can harm Slide's reputation. I think this was one of Slide's > main problems before: People posting to the list about problems with the > 1.0.x no one maintains ony more. I'd say if we release something with > Slide 2.0 there must be someone who takes care of it. Ingo, will you? > > Oliver > > Ingo Brunberg wrote: > > > After having had just a rough look at it, I would say it is still > > correct. Note that this part of the client has not undergone any > > changes for ages. > > > > Ingo > > > > > >>I am currently going through the docs and found an awful lot of outdated > >>stuff. Is the command line client doc at > >> > >>http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/webdav-client.html > >> > >>still valid? > >> > >>Oliver > >> > >>Ingo Brunberg wrote: > >> > >> > >>>As there were some postings recently that showed some peoples interest > >>>in the command line client, I would not consider dropping it. Although > >>>there is a better competitor named cadaver, I think it's not too bad. > >>> > >>>Ingo > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>I think Ingo is the one to talk to on this matter. I was just wondering > >>>>if the commandline client is *really* useful and matches the quality of > >>>>the client library or the rest of Slide. If not I would propose to drop > >>>>it as well. > >>>> > >>>>Oliver --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
