1. Someone getting started needs to have something they can use to see how to implement on the client libraries.
2. How else will someone starting from a release going to manage a Slide repository? We certainly don't want to tell someone they need to "write a client implementation" or "use cadaver".
3. Too many other places, in other projects, refer people to Slide for a "working WebDAV Client".
4. It is handy to use to test custom stores.
While I agree it doesn't fully expose the client library, I think that is easy enough to do and I am going to provide a patch or two to help with that.
Ollie
Martin Dulisch wrote:
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2004 15:00
I think Ingo is the one to talk to on this matter. I was just wondering if the commandline client is *really* useful and matches the quality of the client library or the rest of Slide. If not I would propose to drop it as well.
I do not use the commandline client so I dont know. But in the last days there have been some mails on the lists from people who use this client. What do they say?
Martin
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
