I think Ingo is the one to talk to on this matter. I was just wondering if the commandline client is *really* useful and matches the quality of the client library or the rest of Slide. If not I would propose to drop it as well.

Oliver

Martin Dulisch wrote:




From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



...

- There have been proposals to split Slide in multiple parts, but there seems to be no ongoing work on it. What is the status?


I would like to propose the following separation of the webdav client parts:
New folder under slide root: 'webdavclient'

webdavclient
  + lib
  + commandline
    + src
      + java (1)
      + bin  (2)
  + clientlib
    + src
      + java (3)

Copy sources as follows:
to (1): from folder 'src/webdav/client/src' package org.apache.webdav.cmd
to (2): folder 'src/webdav/client/bin'
to (3): from folder 'src/webdav/client/src' package org.apache.webdav.lib
to (3): folder 'src/util'

What is with the pakages org.apache.webdav.ant and org.apache.webdav.ui? Can
they be deleted or are they running?

The lib folder should contain the commons-httpclient.jar and
commons-logging.jar.

When one of the commiters creates this new folder (webdavclient) I could
contirbute a ant build script for the client parts.

What do you think?

Martin


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


.






---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to