I want to roll out a beta release for Slide 2.0 and we were discussing if we should have it mirrored or not. It is the first release for over 2 years now and thus we expect many downloads, even though I can not tell what that means in numbers.
If we decide to have it at http://www.apache.org/dist/ shall I move the 1.0.x release to http://archive.apache.org/dist/ in order to avoid confusion or shall I leave it where it is.
Thanks in advance for clarifications!
Cheers,
Oliver
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
ref: http://www.apache.org/dev/mirrors.html
"Releases that are not intended for general public consumption should be placed on cvs.apache.org. This includes automated test builds (cvs.apache.org/builds/) and pre-release versions (cvs.apache.org/dist/). Essentially, any release that you do not consider ready for prime time"
However, I thought I recalled a rule of thumb that if you expect more than about 600 downloads, put it under the mirror structure. Any expectation for Slide?
In any event, just check with infrastructure@ for guidance.
--- Noel
.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
