>If not, you're probably overflowing the port by the high speed. 19200 is >the best you can expect out of an 8250 (aka: 16450) chip. Actually to be accurate, the 8250 and 16450 are distinct beasts. The latter has a 1 byte buffer. Neither are to be used for high-speed modems though. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the text
- [SLUG] 486 sans dial-up? No Slashdot for you... Come back, ... Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] 486 sans dial-up? No Slashdot for you... Co... Ben Donohue
- Re: [SLUG] 486 sans dial-up? No Slashdot for you... Co... Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] 486 sans dial-up? No Slashdot for you..... Terry Collins
- Re: [SLUG] 486 sans dial-up? No Slashdot for you... Co... Andrew Macks
- Re: [SLUG] 486 sans dial-up? No Slashdot for you... Co... Alexander Else
- Re: [SLUG] 486 sans dial-up? No Slashdot for you... Co... Gregg
- Re: [SLUG] 486 sans dial-up? No Slashdot for you..... Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] 486 sans dial-up? No Slashdot for y... Andrew Macks
- Re: [SLUG] 486 sans dial-up? No Slashdot f... Alexander Else
- Re: [SLUG] 486 sans dial-up? No Slash... Jeff Waugh
