It really blew my mind when DaZZa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > > I vaguely recall someone commenting the other day on kernel 2.4.10. > > > Could someone re-iterate the gist of these comments? Is 2.4.10 worth > > > installing, or is it fubar? > > > > 2.4.10 is running fine here. > On what hardware?
Dual 450MHz PIII, 256Meg of ram, SCSI disks. This has been rock solid and the VM behaviour has been a big improvement over previous 2.4 kernels. > > I think the fubar one was 2.4.11 > I was under the impression that anything after 2.4.9 was somewhat suspect. I like mine :-). Erik -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yes it's valid) +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Windows: Proof that Microsoft has a roomful of monkeys with keyboards. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
