<quote who="DaZZa">
> And since my problems with this box seem to stem from kernel paging
> requests failing, it seems a new VM might go a long way to fixing my
> problems.
Were you using the recommended (and very much required, at least for early
2.4 kernels) 2 * RAM swap space? That can fix a *lot* of problems.
> > Anything after 2.4.10 has been borked in one way or another (parallel port
> > issues, etc, etc. Read Kernel Traffic or LWN's kernel page for more info).
>
> After 2.4.10 - does this include 2.4.10, or is 2.4.10 relatively stable?
Greater than only. :) 2.4.10 seems ok for me. The more recent ones have all
had silly little things that would Never Have Happened if Linus had opened
2.5 and Alan was maintaining 2.4.
;)
- Jeff
--
"If your life was a movie, would you pay to see it? Would you pay to
see an advertisement for it?" - James Morris
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
