On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > I was under the impression that anything after 2.4.9 was somewhat suspect. > > Anything after 2.4.9 has the new VM.
And since my problems with this box seem to stem from kernel paging requests failing, it seems a new VM might go a long way to fixing my problems. > Anything after 2.4.10 has been borked in one way or another (parallel port > issues, etc, etc. Read Kernel Traffic or LWN's kernel page for more info). After 2.4.10 - does this include 2.4.10, or is 2.4.10 relatively stable? Regardless, it sounds like 2.4.10 will fix my problems. You have much educated me, and I am forever greatful. DaZZa -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
