On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > tree at this version for some time, and it works very nicely. Jaq has > > > mentioned that 2.4.8 is his favourite though (SGI CVS too), which was pre > > > 2.4.10-pre10 with the Rik van Riel VM. > > Jeff, do you _ever_ speak plain english? :-) > > :(
Hey, for those of us who don't have the time or resources to keep up with everything, lines like yours look like either black magic, or another language. :-) > Andrea Arcangeli is the hacker behind the new Virtual Memory subsystem in [...snipt...] > they're prone to a bit of flamage now and then). Thank you. I am now much enlightened. > > I'm trying to stick to the kernel tree's provided by SuSE, because they > > have all the extra bits the distribution relies on built in already. > > Generally a good idea. Makes life easier for me, anyway. Especially with custom bits of kernel code for video cards and what not stuck in there by the distribution vendors. > > Seeing as you're hard core debian, I doubt anything except saying "I'm > > switching to Debian tomorrow" would enable you to give me more information > > than you already have. :) > > Bugger off! :) Linux is Linux, and we all have the same kernel! (WEEEELL...) :-) DaZZa -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
