>Dazza, > >I was not acting on behalf of the committee, but as a member of the list >who's fed up with the level of poor advocacy SLUG portrays. > >Snide comments, MS bashing and flame wars really don't make the group >look to good from the inside, let alone the outside. > >Perhaps I should have read the article, however I (not the committee) >belive that advocacy issues belong on -chat... positive or not. The >committee don't all buy into that, and that is cool.
Tony, You may believe you were acting "off your own bat", as it were, but as a committee member comments like this *will* be seen as a "committee directive".... Might I humbly suggest that if you are acting as a "committee member" in these emails, and the content of your email reflects the will of the committee, then that's fine wether we agree with it or not.... If, however, you are acting as a "private" SLUG member, then you refrain from making these public comments about what YOU believe or do not believe the list should be... After all, you have no more right to post here than the rest of us, and I'm sure you are intelligent enough to find the DELETE key if you don't like a particular email... Jon -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
