<quote who="Stuart Guthrie">

> As far as anything to do with .NET bindings to FOSS, that will probably
> end up a bigger can of worms than SCO.  I can almost here big Bill in
> Seattle in the background "Mwah, hwa, hwa" (little finger on side of
> cheek)

Only if people use/rewrite non-ECMA bits, which may be encumbered. .NET is
actually a really kickarse devel platform, and the MS guys have been very
helpful with alternative implementations of it. Even if you dodge all of the
MS-only, non-standardised stuff, it is still a great platform (as shown by
the speed of the Mono project and unencumbered software based on it).

For GUI apps, you can write against Qt or GTK+ wtih Mono/C# and port to
Windows without using any MS-only, non-standardised stuff. It pays to be
cautious, but not to be unnecessarily FUDly. Embrace and extend.

- Jeff

-- 
linux.conf.au 2004: Adelaide, Australia         http://lca2004.linux.org.au/
 
    "Ever had a morning where you were not kissed and told 'I love you,'
       when the night before you SCREWED so wildly that you could not
        remember? GOOD MORNING!!!!" - Andre Hedrick, Linux ATA Dude
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to