On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 23:23, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> Only if people use/rewrite non-ECMA bits, which may be encumbered. .NET is
> actually a really kickarse devel platform, and the MS guys have been very
> helpful with alternative implementations of it. Even if you dodge all of the
> MS-only, non-standardised stuff, it is still a great platform (as shown by
> the speed of the Mono project and unencumbered software based on it).

It will be interesting to see if this continues. Andrew Tridgell
remarked to me a few months back that it used to be that the Samba team
could get answers from Microsoft Engineering - in fact, the two groups
had a decent relationship and the Microsoft techies appreciated that the
Samba group were finding bugs in SMB implementations under Windows.

Apparently, in the last 18 months, this activity has cooled off
dramatically - as Microsoft has come to realize that  Samba is a key
component enabling heterogeneous networks - and therefore a "direct"
threat to them, the word has gone out inside Microsoft that supporting
Samba is not cool.

It will be a shame when Microsoft corporate comes to realize that Mono
et al are a direct threat as well; I can't imagine them acting any
differently in that situation. Oh well. It'll be fun while it lasts ;)

AfC

-- 
Andrew Frederick Cowie
Operational Dynamics Consulting Pty Ltd

Australia +61 2 9977 6866  North America +1 646 270 5376

http://www.operationaldynamics.com/
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to