Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > [off-list] > ^ alarm bells ringing! oops! hello!
Wondered what that noise was. >> I never said you intentionally meant to spread FUD. I just think you did >> so accidentally. No bid deal. >> >> You need to stop using terms like 'you need to'. > > Odd how I didn't use those words at all. :-) You need not be so pedantic. :) I've been using Red Hat kernels on debian (I think the last one I got was from fedora, so not a RHEL one) Would you have any information on hand on the RHEL kernels, what version and patches? (quick google didn't do it for me). How RHEL kernels differ from other RH kernels? The only thing I found was an opinion that one of RHEL kernel goals was performance on high end servers. I don't understand why the first thing some people do is replace their RH kernels. I've seen a number of times on this list people recommending to replace the default red hat kernel, is it for technical reasons, because you can, or because it's cool? My opinion is red hat put a lot of work in to their kernels, why not benefit from it? -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
