<quote who="Mike MacCana"> > > Opinion: For many of the reasons why sensible people chose not to > > upgrade their servers to Red Hat 8 and 9, you probably shouldn't upgrade > > your server to Fedora Core 1. That's mostly to do with goals, level of > > testing and stuff like that. > > Jeff: That needs a lot more qualification if you don't want it to sound > like FUD.
It's an opinion. Were I using a Red Hat derivative, I wouldn't run a 'real' server on 8, 9 or FC1. I'd run RHEL. > > Fedora's goal is not "to be an utterly stable OS designed for server > > use". > > Neither is Linux's. Otherwise binary compatibility wouldn't be broken in > the kernel and glibc every five seconds. > > People use it for servers anyway with the proviso that they can work > around the problems that come with such rapid development. You snipped out that whole bit where I said "if you think you can support it...". I say exactly the same thing about Debian. So sensitive. :-) - Jeff -- GVADEC 2004: Kristiansand, Norway http://2004.guadec.org/ "The aim of the release process is to finish software, not to develop it..." - Havoc Pennington -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
