On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 09:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 06:35:25 +0000 > Mike MacCana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 08:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 04:45:57 +0000 > > > Mike MacCana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I would too. But the way you worded it sounds like anyone who ever used > > > > 8 or 9 made a bad decision. The lack of technical qualification makes it > > > > fud-like. > > > > > Well, how would YOU word it then. > > > > I'd actually state the technical or otherwise reason for the statement. > > I was trying to prove my contention by getting you to rephrase Jeff's > remark in a more neutral manner. With the fact that you have declined to do
I disagree. In case it isn't obvious (it should be), the statement above means I would re-word Jeff's answer as follows: I wouldn't use Red Hat because (reason). Mike -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
