Title: RE: [smartBridges] We've just about had it

I would say reflections. Change the omni’s to sectors as soon as you can. This will eliminate many potential problems. If you can get sectors soon enough, Try using flat panels for a short time. I have discovered that a 13dbm panel, 8 miles away from the AP receives the same signal strength even if you are off by 30* left or right and 15* up or down (with a clear LOS).

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] We've just about had it

 

It could be the omni's or it could be upload traffic. Do you have a lot of upload traffic from your subs?

 

----- Original Message -----

From: phantam

Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 9:17 AM

Subject: RE: [smartBridges] We've just about had it

 

All I can say is keep goin SB, they have been here for us since we started using them just this AB freezing problem that supposedly the other atmel users have fixed so maybe it's the same problem who knows.

But besides that the AB's are working perfect except for a freeze every so often sporadically.

What my problem now is I have like 75 people pointed to 3 APPO's on 1 tower all different channels all omni (I know bad choice im switching them to all sector's soon) but recently in the last 3 days I am seeing EXTREMELY heavy packetloss on all the radio's but not my ATM 5.8ghz network that comes through this repeater as well. So my question is , NO THIS IS NOT A SB PROBLEM as far as I can tell because ei tried restarting them all. What could cause this all of a sudden, adding toomany customers right now the numbers are 19,25,28 (it goes up cause some people turn there teletronics off during the night for whatever reason there weird) or noise or interference or what I'm just now sure. A GSM tower went up about 200' infront of our tower we're at top of the hill (600' tall) and the tower I figured wasn't active didn't see any equipment but it DID go up around the same time as problems started.

 

Thanks guys,
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 10:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  For my full time job I do a lot of T1 circuits and we do a lot of crimping
in the field, at every cell site we crimp our own and most demarcs are punch
down blocks.
        Joe
     RiverNet

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gary Garrett
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 6:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] We've just about had it

 

That is correct they do use an RJ-11 in Telco Demarc boxes outdoors, but
bear in mind the Telco installers are never expected to crimp the plug
on. It is factory installed and sealed where the wire meets the
connector and only the pins are exposed to the humidity. When one of
these things is suspected of being bad they toss it and a new Demarc box
is installed. Expensive but idiot proof.

Mark Radabaugh wrote:

>
>
>I don't think I would discount the CAT5 ethernet connector too quickly.
>Keep in mind that design of the connector is NOT new and properly crimped
>with good cable the connection is very reliable.  The RJ connectors are
used
>very extensivly outdoors - check any telco DMARC installed outside in the
>last 20 years.
>

 

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
Archives: http://198.63.203.6

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://198.63.203.6 

Reply via email to