As Joshua Memtioned, the problem is ZFS only consider physical block size when
we try to replace an 512e device to a ashift=9 pool.
We will test the patched platform.
在 16/9/21 03:00，“Joshua M. Clulow”<j...@sysmgr.org> 写入:
On 20 September 2016 at 07:00, InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter
> try changing this in /kernel/drv/sd.conf
This is not likely to help. The original post is about a pool with
512 byte sectors, and replacement with a 4K/512e disk.
The problem is that ZFS currently only considers the physical block
size, which is already 4K, when attaching a device to a pool. In this
particular case, though it is likely suboptimal, it is technically
acceptable to attach a 512e device to the pool. That's what the
patched platform I linked to has been modified to do, and what OS-4718
Joshua M. Clulow
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00
Modify Your Subscription:
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com