Zhenghui Xie writes: > milestone/network will be enabled fairly early by NWAM, actually once > NWAM configure IP on any interface, milestone/network will be enabled > and be online.
Any? Does that include lo0? > Would this be a good reason to ask IP tunneling depend on > milestone/netowrk? The reason I ask is because we won't have some > service to represent "non-IP-tunnel" IP interface. I think we might be better off avoiding having IP tunneling depend on milestone/network. Besides being just plain confusing (tunnels aren't themselves part of the network?), I think we have a way now to make the dependency itself unnecessary. I continue to be confused by milestone/network, though. It seems to mean something in a few special cases (such as when you have a statically configured interface on your system), but likely has indeterminate meaning otherwise. -- James Carlson, KISS Network <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
