After trying both for a month each I much preferred Lightroom and use it quite a bit, mostly for organising and not so much for editing the pictures themselves. The export functions and ability to build up and pare down groups are very good IMHO.
All the best, Jason On 5 Jan 2010, at 13:07, Matt Healey wrote: > I’ll third that. Aperture is by far and away more accessible for > correcting and improving photos and also for collating everything > together. If you’re used to how iPhoto works then Aperture is simply > the next step up. However, lightroom has a really simple web export > function that as far as I know exceeds Apertures efforts (for making > online slideshows etc). Sure Aperture 3 will have lots more of this > though. > > Cheers. > > > On 05/01/2010 11:22, "Steve Vyse" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I strongly second Sam over Aperture. Adobe seem to have lost the >> plot with Lightroom. >> >> I love Aperture and wonder when the next version will appear. >> >> Regards > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Sussex Mac User Group" group. > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/smug?hl=en-GB > . -- Cllr Jason Kitcat City Councillor, Regency Ward Brighton & Hove Green Party http://www.jasonkitcat.com + 44 (0) 7956 886 508 Group spokesperson on Health and Waste issues -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sussex Mac User Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/smug?hl=en-GB.
