Hi Ranulph

What do you mean by image catalogues? Aperture requires photos to be stored
in projects, which can be nested in folders (selecting the folder combines
the projects), photos can then be combined into albums and uploaded as
Flickr (sets) or Facebook albums as well as MobileMe integration as well as
a number of other others I haven't explored yet (Smart Album, Book, Light
Table, Slideshow, Web Journal, Web Page, Smart Website).

Adjustments you make to a photo within Aperture are non destructive allowing
you to access your original (master) at any time.

Alastair

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Ranulph Glanville <[email protected]> wrote:

> Can I just confirm that aperture will give me image catalogues. I used
> iview for years, and it had advantages even if it wasn't pretty. Moving to
> iphoto, I discovered, is dangerous: lost images, originals damaged etc. Now
> that aperture doesn't cost an arm and a leg, I'm thinking I might move to
> that for general editing of photos, and for cataloguing.
>
> Confirmations gratefully accepted!
>
> Thanks, Ranulph
>
> PS I assume the problems of disappearing images etc that one gets with
> iphoto don't happen with aperture?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Sussex Mac User Group" group.
> To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/smug?hl=en-GB.
>



-- 
P Before you print think about the ENVIRONMENT

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sussex Mac User Group" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/smug?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to