I'm inclined to agree that Pages is worth serious consideration. I co-edit a quarterly history magazine and we use Pages. Footnotes, end notes, indexing, TOC, and citation (just about to start using BibDesk for this), etc. Much easier than Word especially with combining character, line, and paragraph adjustments, and my co-editor is a longstanding Word user who agrees.
Regards, Tony Sent from my iPad On 13 Mar 2011, at 19:38, Patrick James <[email protected]> wrote: > In your earlier email you write: > > >> Last time I looked, Pages didn't even do footnotes! indexing? >> cross-referencing? citation systems? And it doesn't handle custom graphics >> in headed paper. I'm not even going to mention Track Changes... > > Well I repeat, that it does all of these things superbly well. > > I have used Pages for years, and I have a massive experience in using word > processors and in using mark up languages. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sussex Mac User Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/smug?hl=en-GB.
