|
Ditto...
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:23
AM
Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Defense Accused of
Smearing Victim
But is it irrelevant? If she had sex
with even just *one* person in the same time frame as the alleged assault,
isn't it within the realm of possibility that it was that other person that
actually committed the assault. See what I'm saying, I'm not saying that
it makes Kobe innocent, but it does make it difficult to know what the truth
is. And I'm with Stephi...it's just nasty she had (if the reports are
true) multiple men's semen in her panties. Couldn't she at least have
changed them?
If she had sex a week before, it's not
relevant, but if she had it within the time fram the injuries could have
occurred it is extremely relevant.
Charles
Mims
Prosecutors said the question was a "deliberate and calculated" attempt to
elicit testimony on evidence irrelevant so early in the case and came even
though "attorneys are expected to proceed in an ethical manner."
"
________________________________
Changes to your subscription
(unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
|
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
