My point was if the information was correct, it wasn't a attempt to "smear" her by asking what they did...merely speaking the truth.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Defense Accused of Smearing Victim

In a message dated 10/15/2003 12:24:22 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

If *none* of the seaman found on her or in her, was his.....their blowing hot air. Smearing her rep my big toe, more like the truth. *IF* the report of the seaman being other guys was true.....
 
In fact if it's true, hard to see how they could say  this with a straight face.


if theres none there why did he say he had sex with her?


________________________________

Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
________________________________

Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to 
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net 

Reply via email to