That's true.  It's probably fair to say that the preliminary hearing was the incorrect venue to bring it up.  On the other hand if it is true the prosecution is obscuring exculpatory evidence it should come up before trial.  Perhaps in motions instead of the hearing though.
 
Charles Mims
http://www.the-sandbox.org
 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Defense Accused of Smearing Victim

In a message dated 10/15/2003 12:59:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

My point was if the information was correct, it wasn't a attempt to "smear" her by asking what they did...merely speaking the truth.


but the article said it was a misreprensentation so until its entered into actual evidence that cant be disputed its all hearsay aint it?
________________________________

Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to 
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net 

Reply via email to