RE: [Sndbox] Defense Accused of Smearing Victim

[Charles]

The defense just filed a motion (that makes it all official) that there is compelling evidence that supports Bryant's innocence and are asking the judge for permission to present it.  I'm betting, given the past rulings from this judge that the permission will be denied and that will be yet one more bullet for appeal.   Charles Mims http://www.the-sandbox.org     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Hopper Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:23 PM To: The Sandbox Discussion List Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Defense Accused of Smearing Victim Maybe, but my point was the article was wrong.....if the info was correct.  ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:00 PM Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Defense Accused of Smearing Victim In a message dated 10/15/2003 12:59:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My point was if the information was correct, it wasn't a attempt to "smear" her by asking what they did...merely speaking the truth. but the article said it was a misreprensentation so until its entered into actual evidence that cant be disputed its all hearsay aint it? ________________________________ Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net

________________________________

Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to 
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net