I thought that Bush wanted more UN involvement too. I was under the impression that the UN just wasn't cooperating. There are a lot of countries that *are* helping... I think Italy, Spain and South Korea... those are the ones that surprised me anyway... and of course GB. I am sure that there are many more.
IMO. Hillary carried herself off as a typical politician and did not commit any major sins with her statements given todays political climate. Bottom line... I don't think that her trip the Mid East was comparable to Jane Fonda's antics during Vietnam.
On Tuesday, December 2, 2003, at 08:38 AM, Charles wrote:
Her argument needs to be looked at and honestly debated. But in a war zone
is not the place to debate internal politics no matter which side of the
aisle you are on.
Frankly I think we need to repossess the land the UN is located on.
Charles Mims http://www.the-sandbox.org
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Tim Harder
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 8:22 AM
To: The Sandbox Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Were Hillary's Words Treasonous?
OK... I read a few more reports... basically her main criticism was that we
need more UN involvement. She thinks that Bush is somehow holding it back
or messing that up, which is stupid if you ask me... Koffe Anan won't even
attend the meetings. I bet he would if Hillary was the president.
_______________________________________________ Sndbox mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
_______________________________________________ Sndbox mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
