|
I'm just saying that if you are using
support for the UN as a criteria then the current Bush would run afoul of
that. I'm not convinced that he doesn't take after his father in the
one world govt. department, that's why I mentioned it.
I do know that Bush (current one) thinks
very highly *publicly* of the UN. Now he may think differently privately, but me
and Lowell have gone round on this before...I think what he thinks privately
should be what he says publicly. If the public doesn't like it then them's
the breaks.
I hate politicians that don't say what they
really think.
Like Tim said....I do like this Bush.
I just wish he'd show some leadership domestically the way he has
internationally. I like the way he has handled the war. I like the
way he has handled the terrorists.
I think he is a democrat in social
concerns.
Charles Mims
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bethany Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:42 PM To: The Sandbox Discussion List Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Were Hillary's Words Treasonous? The UN is useless
where our country is concerned, is what I am saying.
They do not care about
this country. The UN is fine for helping out on the rebuild on Iraq. But as far
as the United states getting their approval for anything we do..that's a joke to
me.
I have never said I
was a big fan of Bush41, so not sure where that is coming from.
I think I even
admitted here that I voted against Bush41 in 1992.
|
_______________________________________________ Sndbox mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
